INTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS
Marriage
|
Why do people marry?
Traditionally, it is so that they may create favourable conditions for
the development of their offspring, although some spouses do not intend to
have children and others – to their intense regret – are
unable to.
Although the traditional supports for marriage, such as solemn vows to
remain together 'for richer for poorer, for better for worse, in sickness
and in health' and 'till death us do part' were probably intended
principally for the benefit of children, they may also have helped make
both spouses feel secure in their relationship.
|
Re-marriage
|
Unfortunately, the
support that such vows provide – however sincerely held –
sometimes fails and a state of 'quiet despair' is no longer regarded as
an acceptable solution. Divorce is common and the distress
it causes tends to shatter the sense of security the spouses and
their children have become accustomed to.
None the less, many divorced people re-marry and thus hazard their
emotional tranquillity afresh. Why? What
motivates them? Is it a wish to fill a physical and
emotional void, to persuade themselves that they can yet achieve the
true love that surmounts all difficulties?
|
Unrealistic expectations
|
Couples who live
together sometimes find themselves in what has been described as ‘the
most difficult relationship of all’.
That is especially true if their other interests do not coincide.
They tend to create unrealistic expectations.
What seems perfectly natural and acceptable to one can be
extremely irritating and intolerable for the other.
Mutual understanding may become increasingly difficult as earlier
hopes of long-term happiness begin to fade.
If, or when, their relationship begins to falter, resentment at past
behaviour may need to be acknowledged but apportioning blame is futile
and only makes a final break more likely.
Life only goes forward.
‘Going back to the way we were’ is not an option.
|
Marital
contracts
|
A
more realistic option may be to hire a consultant who specialises in this
kind of work. That will probably involve agreeing a
contract. The Latin words from which 'contract' derives mean
a 'drawing together'.
Although the purpose of traditionally long betrothals was probably to
encourage the formation of free, explicit contracts, their relative failure
in modern society suggests that even they are not adequate and may need
to be re-negotiated from time to time.
So, just as any long, arduous journey begins with a single step, a more
explicit and detailed contract increases the chances of a relationship that will
engender long-term mutual
satisfaction.
|
True
love
|
Some partners may regard
formal contracts as a hindrance to ‘true love’ but, if their love is
to be mutually fulfilling, they need to acknowledge, and perhaps
disclose, their real
feelings and motivation. If
they balk at that, they
will tend to rely, perhaps without realising it, on their own preferred version of
the contract! Thus, a barely
discernable gap opens, a gap that tends to become ever wider, so that
really genuine communication becomes more difficult, attenuating the force of a love that
once portended eternal happiness.
|
No one,
it seems, can define what 'true love' comprises! The
romantic aura created by popular authors, lyricists and
copywriters, past and p resent,
seems to have conditioned us to believe in something that never existed,
effectively concealing the fact that sexual union is driven primarily by
biological needs.
As a result, partners can easily become infatuated with the object of
their desire and tend to assume that true love is simply a matter of wishing
hard enough.
But – as so many know from agonising experience –
infatuation is by its nature transitory and at best creates unrealistic
expectations, propped up by complaisance and ritual. Mutual
understanding evanesces as the expectations peter out. What one partner considers entirely
normal and acceptable
may be extremely irritating for the other.
They
begin to realise that they are united not to a
real person but to the idealised image they had of that person!
The task of forging a truly satisfying relationship can only
begin if they are able to recognise the true nature of their
expectations.
|
Negotiating
a contract
|
Financial,
domestic and social matters are clearly important in a marital contract but others may be
equally important because circumstances alter in the course of time. The
form of the contract should be flexible enough to allow for the fact that either partner,
for instance, is likely to change psychologically, physically or
both without premonition.
If the contract is mainly oral or imprecise, it will probably need to be reviewed
more frequently than one that is more formal and, to create the necessary flexibility,
the contract may need to specify
times set aside in which true feelings and thoughts can be
declared and discussed without rancour — because undisclosed feelings
and thoughts are like unexploded bombs.
Those times can also be
used as opportunities for negotiating adjustments
to the contract.
Difficulty finding time for this may signify that the relationship is wavering.
|
Compatibility
|
It may be, of
course, that negotiating a mutually satisfactory contract will reveal so much incompatibility
that the parties feel obliged to abandon their
plans. If that happens, their disappointment is likely to be
immense — but not as immense perhaps as the emotional void that
can so easily open when anyone has little choice but to abandon an
entrenched illusion. Arrangements
that are unrealistic
increase the likelihood that hot blood will begin to run
through a channel of indifference, or even hatred, rather than of love.
|
A
final break |
If, despite all
their endeavours, partners reach a point when a final break seems
inescapable, the consultant will try to help them find ways of loosening
their ties with the minimum of distress to everyone likely to be
affected.
That is especially important, of course, if some of those
involved are children.
Failure to negotiate or re-negotiate a mutually satisfactory contract
does not imply that either partner, or both, is forever incapable of
establishing one.
It merely implies that they have failed to do so in that instance.
|
Better Relationships
[Top]
|